Friday, October 23, 2009

Double standards

My last blog entry on role models made me think of double standards, especially in the US (if only because I happen to reside in the US, and am more familiar with everyday life here than elsewhere).

Here is another double standard for you – related, I think, to the double standard that allows Jerry Brookheimer to make TV in which I am subjected to a grisly murder (with lots of food colouring and Karo syrup) in the first three seconds before I can even reach the remote to shut the TV off – but in which it is offensive to women to have a plucky female character tied to the buzzsaw.

Some of you may be familiar with Philip Pullman’s sort-of children’s book series called His Dark Materials. The first book of the three was published in the UK as Northern Lights and in the US as The Golden Compass (also the title of the movie they made of it). The books are a little controversial because the author is a self-avowed atheist, and the books are seen as anti-religion in general and anti-Catholic in particular. I have my problems with some aspects of the books – having read the first one – not because he is anti-religion, more because his hostility to organized religion is so adolescent, so fundamentally trivial for all the gussying up.

But I digress. Small parts of the last book in the series were censored in the US because of references to the central character’s (a girl on the edge of puberty) emerging sexuality. Now, before we go all gangbusters on an anti-censorship rant, let’s admit that free speech has some limit, even if the right is very broad. We don’t want graphic porn in the hands of little kids, for example (well, I don’t).

But Pullman is hardly porn. So even though I really disagree with this particular example of censorship, it’s on the lack of merit of this case, rather than a general (and empty) platitude of “censorship is wrong.”

Now at the same time, this being close to Hallowe’en, one can go to any mall in my area and find specialty seasonal stores selling costumes and props for Hallowe’en for kiddies and grownups. Have you seen what they make for little kids these days? I don’t mean 18 yr olds, or even 13 year olds. I mean have you seen what they are selling for 6 year olds? Let’s just say things that in my view are highly age-inappropriate. Stuff with the same creepy tinge as the sort of outfits you’d find in very disturbing JonBenet kiddie beauty pageants.

So let me get this straight: it’s OK to dress up my first grader like a whore from the Emerald City of Oz, but it’s not ok to let my adolescent daughter read something true and accurate about her first sexual feelings. Right. And I am weird for liking damsels in distress?

2 comments:

  1. My friend, we have a sex problem in this country (perhaps, it is cross-cultural: I am familiar with some of the logical contortions that occur about Sex in some Latin American countries, as well, but that is another topic.)

    Usually when we talk about censorship here, it is said to be about censoring "Sex and Violence". What it really _means_ is that it's about censoring "Sex, ... and any Violence which might ultimately _imply_ Sex".

    As you point out, and as an example, Bruckheimer's latest "NCIS: LA" began with five minutes of police chase, leaving three people bloodily dead in a snowstorm of gunfire. The show ended with one of the protagonists using his special elite military skills to put a bullet in the head of the Bad Guy, who happened to be the actual father of the kidnapped little girl, with her just barely out of sight. This show is (apparently) a highly-rated show (I thought the premiere episode was adequate, no more, no less). Everyone loves it, and I've heard nary a peep about it being inappropriate.

    But let me throw you a curve ball: I've seen this Denzel Washington movie (I forget the name) where the climactic scene has him trying to rescue an 11- or 12-year-old little blonde girl, who has been kidnapped, tied up and gagged, and placed on top of a time bomb in a ventilation shaft -- by a _SERIAL KILLER_! Now, there were some other taboos involved in this whole scenario, but note: I've seen this movie on TV about 5 or 6 times and no one says a word about Cleaning Up TV while citing this as an example. Wanna know why? MY theory is ... NO SEX was ever implied, regarding the little girl. (Indeed, none was implied between Denzel and the mother, who was certainly available and ... but, well, that's another story for another double standard, another day).

    Meanwhile, Twisted Smile (remember them?) had to close down the site because about ten years ago, we decided to Clean Up the Internet ... and all bondage sites (harmless or not) were in the crosshairs.


    We're a lot more comfortable with Violence in this culture than we are with Sex, my friend. The bad news may be that we aren't even the worst Sexaphobics on the planet.

    (And, no, obviously, I don't think you're weird for liking DiD. Hell, I don't even care if I am or not, anymore (that's kind of unfair, 'cause I never did care if I were or not). I just know to keep it to myself, and if someone else finds out about it, oh, well.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. We're the only ones who aren't weird, obviously. We have at least taken the time to analyse how and why we behave in the way we do, and to wonder about the divide between reality and fantasy. Yup, all perfectly well adjusted around here. Move along, nothing to see.

    ReplyDelete